Operation Rubific, the portrait of failure
“There are two kinds of British scandal. The old kind resemble the plays of Henrik Ibsen: studies of character failings and personal humiliation brought about by greed, desire and dishonesty. Think of the disgrace of John Profumo, Jeffrey Archer and Jonathan Aitken. The new owe more to Joseph Heller: portraits of institutional failure, in which the craven, the cynical and the helpless are trapped in crises they cannot control.
They are less salacious but far more corrosive, and they have piled up at alarming speed: from the negligence that saw patients treated with disease-ridden blood products to the bureaucratic inertia that led to the fire at Grenfell Tower and the fumbled response to the covid-19 pandemic. On July 15th another was exposed. In the High Court Sir Martin Chamberlain cancelled a super-injunction, applied contra mundum (against everyone), which had rendered a government programme called Operation Rubific a state secret…
The court papers read like a parody of 1950s Whitehall: low-level incompetence, an impulse to secrecy, a fixation with upholding institutional reputations and an aversion to accountability. The only riddle is which part of the state emerges most damaged…
The pattern of recent institutional scandals is unmistakable. They begin with low-level carelessness. Crises are massaged rather than confronted; a preoccupation with the “optics” of a policy triumphs over whether the policy is any good. So often, the first instinct of officialdom is to cover up, and then to lawyer up, and then, when that strategy is exhausted, to reach for the chequebook. And even then, names go unnamed; no one gets fired; and no one, ever, takes the blame.”
And still it will go on, and on. The Economist